Two names, one operator
The two spellings point at one operation. Community lists carry both, sheets are labelled with both, and readers search one or the other depending on where they first heard of it. This ledger keeps a separate row for each spelling for that reason, not because the rows describe different businesses.
What the rows share is the important part. Purchasing stopped on 12 June 2026, the announced suspension ran to the end of that month, and warehouse and parcel work was described as continuing under the same notice. One notice, two names, no split in the timeline.
The wrapper format is shared as well. An address handed out under either name carries an item ID and a source marker, and the marker decides which marketplace the rebuild points at. Branding sits on the sheet; the marker sits inside the address.
The detail that looks like a difference
There is one genuine difference in the records, and it is not about the operation. The public directory that lists these platforms keeps ACBuy and AllChinaBuy as two separate object pages, each with its own entries, which is why people conclude that two companies must sit behind them.
Separate rows in a directory reflect how people search, not how a business is registered. A directory that merged the two spellings would hide one of them from anybody typing that spelling, so keeping both is the practical choice for a list that wants to be found.
Two pages, one set of behaviours. Both rows carry the same closed status on observed behaviour, both record that no ACBuy-format address is being accepted, and neither publishes fee, storage or payment terms that this site has verified. Identical fields, identical check date.
Why that detail does not split them
If the two names described two operations, they would have separate histories. They do not. The June suspension, the failed July restart, the community message around 10 July and the third-party records from August all describe one operation winding down on one schedule.
Practical tests point the same way. Rebuild a wrapped address from either spelling and you land on the same kind of marketplace listing, read the same way, with the same marker deciding the destination. Nothing about the rebuild changes when the sheet header changes.
The consequence for your own file is simple. Sorting rows into an ACBuy pile and an AllChinaBuy pile creates work that answers no question, because every row in both piles needs the same treatment: read the marker, rebuild, then confirm the source address answers.
The safer way to say it
Two names for one operation is the sentence to carry, and it is enough for a sheet note. The unsafe version treats AllChinaBuy as a separate platform that took over from ACBuy and published its own terms, which sends people looking for rules that do not exist.
When you record it, keep the spelling the sheet used and add the marketplace that the marker points at. That pair of facts is checkable by anybody. A brand name on its own says nothing about where the listing actually lives.
Both ledger rows carry a check date. If one spelling later behaves differently, a page that takes orders again or a notice that names one name only, the dated rows are where that difference will appear first, and this site will record it there rather than in a memory of how things used to look.